A different perception of Levels 1, 2 and 3: Three dimensions
Part II
Graphically depicting the three levels in a three dimensional format gives one a different perception of the three ‘levels’.
In a two dimensional format the levels appear as ‘levels’, appear as heights one must climb like a mountain, while a three dimensional format of the three levels provides a perception of the levels being less like ‘levels’ and being more like ‘locations’/regions within which one is capable of experiencing the physical.
Viewing the ‘levels’ as ‘locations’ removes the perception of relative worth, removes the temptation of judging the merit of an individual based upon the individuals capacity to experiencing a numerical quantity regarding levels. With the concept of levels there is a tendency to consider the individual capacity to experiencing level 2 as being more impressive than a person being capable of experiencing only levels 1 and the individual capacity to experiencing level 3 as being more impressive than a person being capable of experiencing only levels 1 and 2.
A person capable of experiencing level 4 is no more significant than a person capable of experiencing level 3. In fact a person capable of experiencing level 4 has a great responsibility, has the responsibility, the obligation, the divine task of encouraging, guiding, awakening, directing … level 3s into the arena of level 4, into the location of level 4.
The level 4 must reach out to the level 3s who wish to awaken, who are subsumed with the walls of doubt, who are obsessed with the oppressive weight of unending questions regarding the purpose of life, who are seeking to experience a second reality, who are striving to quiet the incessant whispering, haunting, echoing within their mind which says: Yes you have a purpose. You have meaning and then never providing the answer to those seeking.
Part II
Graphically depicting the three levels in a three dimensional format gives one a different perception of the three ‘levels’.
In a two dimensional format the levels appear as ‘levels’, appear as heights one must climb like a mountain, while a three dimensional format of the three levels provides a perception of the levels being less like ‘levels’ and being more like ‘locations’/regions within which one is capable of experiencing the physical.
Viewing the ‘levels’ as ‘locations’ removes the perception of relative worth, removes the temptation of judging the merit of an individual based upon the individuals capacity to experiencing a numerical quantity regarding levels. With the concept of levels there is a tendency to consider the individual capacity to experiencing level 2 as being more impressive than a person being capable of experiencing only levels 1 and the individual capacity to experiencing level 3 as being more impressive than a person being capable of experiencing only levels 1 and 2.
A person capable of experiencing level 4 is no more significant than a person capable of experiencing level 3. In fact a person capable of experiencing level 4 has a great responsibility, has the responsibility, the obligation, the divine task of encouraging, guiding, awakening, directing … level 3s into the arena of level 4, into the location of level 4.
The level 4 must reach out to the level 3s who wish to awaken, who are subsumed with the walls of doubt, who are obsessed with the oppressive weight of unending questions regarding the purpose of life, who are seeking to experience a second reality, who are striving to quiet the incessant whispering, haunting, echoing within their mind which says: Yes you have a purpose. You have meaning and then never providing the answer to those seeking.
RSS Feed